Sections

Weather Forecast

Close
Advertisement
The Minnesota Capitol began to fill with people Monday, May 13 in anticipation of a Senate vote to legalize gay marriage. Supporters came in far larger numbers than opponents. (Photo by Don Davis, Forum News Service)
The Minnesota Capitol began to fill with people Monday, May 13 in anticipation of a Senate vote to legalize gay marriage. Supporters came in far larger numbers than opponents. (Photo by Don Davis, Forum News Service)

Minnesota senators 'vote for love'

Email Sign up for Breaking News Alerts

news Alexandria, 56308

Alexandria Minnesota 225 7th Ave E
P.O. Box 549
56308

ST. PAUL -- Love and marriage soon will go together for Minnesota gays like they do for straight couples.

"Vote yes for love," Minnesota Senator Scott Dibble told his colleagues Monday.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Enough senators agreed and gave the Minneapolis Democrat his wish of a Minnesota that allows same-sex couples to marry, the 12th state to allow it.

"Today we have the power, the awesome humbling power, to make dreams come true." Dibble said as a four-hour, three-minute debate wound down.

Senators voted 37-30 to remove a state law that bans same-sex marriage. The vote followed a Thursday 75-59 House vote, leaving Governor Mark Dayton's signature the last step remaining before gays can marry starting August 1.

Monday's debate was civil and quiet, but still energetic, as Republican after Republican denounced gay marriage or tried to make the bill more palatable. Democrats, meanwhile, compared the historic debate to civil rights efforts of the 1960s.

Republicans argued that God opposes gay marriage, but Senator Ron Latz, DFL-St. Louis Park, turned the tables on them.

"God made gays and God made gays capable of loving people," Latz said. "Who are we to quarrel with God's intentions?"

The two sides of the debate agreed on the importance of the Dibble bill.

"This is a once-in-a-generation kind of a bill," Senator Sean Nienow, R-Cambridge, said. "Pro or con, it doesn't matter."

"I can't think of another vote that I have taken that will impact so many people," Senate Majority Leader Tom Bakk, DFL-Cook, added.

Senator Bill Ingebrigtsen, R-Alexandria, said he is concerned for his grandchildren. "There are going to be some questions about family and family traditions."

While Senator Jeff Hayden, DFL-Minneapolis, said that once the bill passes "it will be OK," but Ingebrigtsen wondered if it would.

"I am not quite so sure everything is going to be OK," said Ingebrigtsen, who said his area is firmly against gay marriage. "That is why I ask members to recognize the core of traditional marriage that we have had for thousands of years."

Dibble, who married his partner Richard Leyva in California in 2008, said that allowing gays to marry would make for stronger communities and state.

"It is a very simple bill, but sometimes the simplest bills are the most powerful in affecting people," Dibble said.

Moments after the vote, Dibble, Leyva, House bill sponsor Representative Karen Clark of Minneapolis and other Democrats received a rousing welcome by the 2,800 people who jammed into the Capitol. Most of the people were gay-rights supporters, although a few opponents were on hand, mostly to pray.

Throughout the debate in the stately Senate chamber, the crowd's songs -- including "Somewhere Over the Rainbow," "Give Love a Chance" and "America" -- filtered through the chamber's massive doors. Loud cheers could be heard from visitors watching television feeds of the debate after supporters spoke.

Senators were quiet during the debate as about 75 House members and Senate staffers lined the walls to watch history being made.

Among provisions Dibble emphasized in his bill are those that protect clergy and religious organizations. He said clergy would not be required to marry same-sex couples and his bill would not affect religious organizations' dealings with gay weddings.

Dibble said state law already only deals with civil marriage, but that his bill adds "civil" before "marriage" in state law to give those concerned about it affecting religious organizations more comfort.

Senator Warren Limmer, R-Maple Grove, said the bill does not go far enough to protect people who have "a contrary opinion." He said all religious organizations would not be protected and no business would be protected.

Dibble said that other than the gay-wedding provisions, there will be no changes in state law that already makes it illegal to discriminate against gays. "What is true today will be true tomorrow."

Senator Paul Gazelka, R-Nisswa, offered an amendment, which failed, that would have extended protections to allow more religious groups opposed to same-sex marriage to decide whether to serve gays.

"It is about living your faith, seven days a week, 24 hours a day," Gazelka said, such as not forcing church-related colleges or private businesses to deal with gay weddings.

Gazelka and Senator Torrey Westrom, R-Elbow Lake, offered the only two proposed amendments Monday. Both failed with most Democrats and a handful of Republicans voting against them.

The Westrom amendment would have kept "mother, father, husband, wife" in various places of state law.

"We would continue to use the same terms we have forever," Westrom said.

Limmer, who authored a bill two years ago to put a gay marriage ban in the state Constitution, said that senators came into the debate "without clear consensus from our community."

On the bill's final vote, three rural Democrats joined all but one Republican in voting against the bill: Sens. LeRoy Stumpf of Plummer, Lyle Koenen of Clara City and Dan Sparks of Austin.

Westrom agreed with others that it was a big day.

"I hope we all know how significant this day could be if this bill passes," Westrom said. "I think there are a lot of unintended consequences."

Westrom wondered what would happen in schools, hinting that it will be required that teachers support gay marriage in the classroom.

"I think this is a wrong step in history, a step we should not be going down," Westrom said.

He said the bill would eliminate "this long standing tradition that our state has recognized since creation that children need a dad and a mom, a male and a female."

HERE'S HOW LOCAL LAWMAKERS VOTED

The gay marriage issue split along party lines for the legislators representing portions of Douglas County. Here's how they voted:

Senator Bill Ingebrigtsen, R-Alexandria, District 8 - no.

Senator Torrey Westrom, R-Elbow Lake, District 12 - no.

Representative Mary Franson, R-Alexandria, District 8B - no.

Representative Jay McNamar, DFL- Elbow Lake, District 12A - yes.

Representative Paul Anderson, R-Starbuck, District 12B - no.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement